Preventing Falls: How to Stay Informed and Prioritize Care

Man and woman walking in nature

More than one in four elderly people (ages 65 and older) suffer from a fall every year. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) statistics demonstrate that just one fall is a preamble to a far scarier story: 

  • Falling just one time can double the chances of that elderly person falling again, which could lead to death
  • 20% of falls result in serious injury
  • Less than 50% of those who suffer from a fall will tell their doctor

See more statistics from the CDC’s Facts About Falls here.

Many Falls are Preventable

“Falls among adults 65 and older caused over 36,000 deaths in 2020, making it the leading cause of injury and death for that group.”(CDC, Older Adults Fall Prevention) 

Many falls are preventable and, as mentioned above, approximately half go unreported. Providers can stay informed with predictive information about their elderly patients to anticipate falls and take action to keep our senior population healthy.

How to Stay Informed: Falls Risk Indicator

One source of information for providers to help fill this reporting gap is Emergency Medical Services (EMS) data on non-transport falls. To help address this issue, UHIN partnered with Utah’s National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS).

UHIN ingests EMS non-transport fall information from NEMSIS and uses it in conjunction with patient age and past encounter diagnoses that have been reported to the CHIE to provide a yes/no risk assessment of a patient’s risk of falling in the short term. Utilizing the CHIE’s Falls Risk Indicator, providers receive timely information about potential falls within their patient population, empowering them to contact patients with the right support to keep them healthy and independent.

Providers can sign up for the Falls Risk Indicator through CHIE Alerts.

How to Prioritize Care: LACE Scores

In addition to the Falls Risk Indicator, notification alerts include data pertaining to the patient’s condition and can include LACE scores to help caregivers prioritize care. LACE scores are industry indicators that assign a score on a scale of 1-19 assessing the patient’s risk of readmission. The score is a combination of the L:length of stay in a hospital (in number of days), A: acuity of admission, C: comorbidities, and E: emergency department visits in the last 6 months.

What is a Patient Event Notification?

Notifications about patients which physicians can receive as a file at their preferred frequency (real time, daily, weekly, monthly) by logging into MYUHIN or integrated into their EHR.

CHIE Alerts with Falls Risk Indicator and LACE Score

CHIE Alerts are automated electronic notifications informing providers about an event their patients have recently experienced. Admission, Discharge and Transfer (ADT) Alerts fill in the missing pieces necessary to manage patient care. The Falls Risk Indicator and LACE Score may be included in CHIE Alerts.

Providers opt-in to receive notifications because they’re an important component of continuity of care. Providers can identify the patients who require critical intervention and schedule follow-up appointments after hospitalizations. Notifications help prevent readmissions, improve care coordination and patient experiences. An additional benefit includes revenue integrity; by allowing providers to bill the appropriate level code, which may be of a higher value in instances of transition of care patients. 

See how Granger medical clinic used ADT Alerts to improve their patient care.

Payers that receive alerts can route patients into case management, which helps to reduce high emergency room department utilizations through increased visibility into member care activities and utilization trends.

Alerts can be tailored by type, such as inpatient, outpatient or emergency, and frequency based on needs and desires. Community providers and payers can receive notifications by subscribing to the CHIE Alerts service and providing UHIN with a panel of patients representative of the population for which they are providing care.

Click below to sign up to receive CHIE Alerts that include a Falls Risk Indicator and LACE Score.


Important Updates to the UHIN Requirements

This notice is to inform you of important updates to the UHIN Requirements. The UHIN Requirements are the standards, specifications, policies, procedures, and guidelines that apply to the UHIN Network. All UHIN members contractually agree to comply with the UHIN Requirements (and changes thereto) as part of their participation in the UHIN Network and their use of UHIN’s clearinghouse, clinical health information exchange (CHIE), and related services. 

The UHIN Board of Directors—which is comprised of community stakeholders from the Utah healthcare community—recently approved the addition of a Member Policies and Procedures Manual (Version 1) (the “Member Manual”) to the UHIN Requirements. The Member Manual supports our community’s compliance with the 21st Century Cures Act interoperability mandates as well as health information privacy, security and breach notification laws. The updated UHIN Requirements may be found at https://support.uhin.org/s/article/Member-Policies-And-Procedures-Manual

The Member Manual includes the following policies applicable to all members:

  • Data Submission Policy
  • Security Specifications and Network Maintenance Policy
  • Security Event Reporting Policy
  • Minimum Necessary Procedure
  • Individual Rights Policy

The Member Manual also contain the following CHIE specific policies to support compliance with the federal prohibition on information blocking:

  • The CHIE No Information Blocking Policy
  • The CHIE Notice and Opt Out Policy
  • The CHIE Permitted Purpose Policy, including expanded permitted purposes that fully support HIPAA-permitted treatment, payment and health care operation activities of health care providers and health plans, as well as UHIN’s uses of CHIE data to support limited public health activities, research and data analytic services (collectively, the “Expanded Permitted Purposes”).  

The Member Manual is effective as of January 1, 2024. 

For organizations or agencies that have, may, or are a CHIE data supplier: pursuant to our current contract, CHIE members who make clinical data available through the CHIE must consent to the Expanded Permitted Purposes. Please sign and return the attached form indicating your affirmative consent to the Expanded Permitted Purposes no later than January 1, 2024. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR ORGANIZATION’S OR AGENCY’S CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE UHIN NETWORK AFTER JANUARY 1, 2024 CONSTITUTES YOUR ORGANIZATION’S OR AGENCY’S IMPLIED CONSENT TO THE EXPANDED PURPOSES. IF YOUR ORGANIZATION OR AGENCY DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE EXPANDED PERMITTED PURPOSES, YOU MUST SEND UHIN YOUR WRITTEN NOTICE OF INTENT TO TERMINATE PARTICIPATION IN THE UHIN NETWORK NO LATER THAN JANUARY 1, 2024.   

If you have any questions please contact us at customersupport@uhin.org.


2023 HIT Conference

The annual Health Information Technology Conference (HIT) will return to Salt Lake on Wednesday, October 18 at the Conference Center at Gail Miller Campus, SLCC. The conference, hosted by UHIN, will look towards the “future of healthcare interoperability” with speakers, leaders and professionals from across the healthcare and technology continuum.

Look to the Future of Healthcare Interoperability

Join office managers, billers, administrators, CEOs, CTOs, CIOs, Chief Medical Officers, VPs, directors, doctors, nurses, and educators.

Learn from speakers from the State of Utah, the Salt Lake Department of Health, Intermountain Health, University of Utah Health, Sharp Index, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Noridian Healthcare Solutions, BYU, healthKERI, Comagine, Molina, SelectHealth, University of Utah Health Plans, UHIN and more.

Conference topics include: Attendees can expect powerful sessions with experts covering important topics in healthcare, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence in healthcare
  • Billing for today and beyond
  • Cybersecurity
  • Digital transformation in healthcare
  • Documentation burden
  • HL7 and FHIR
  • Health equity
  • Health Data Utilities (HDUs)
  • Medicare updates
  • Mental health and burn out
  • Population Health

Welcome Keynote Speakers: Dr. Angela Dunn

Executive Director of the Salt Lake County Health Department

Prior to becoming Executive Director of Salt Lake County Health Department, Dr. Angela C. Dunn served as state epidemiologist for the Utah Department of Health and as an epidemic intelligence service officer for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where she responded to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, as well as several infectious disease outbreaks in Utah including measles, hepatitis C, and campylobacter.

Joy Rios

Afternoon Keynote: Joy Rios

Founder and CEO of the “HIT Like a Girl” podcast

Joy Rios, MBA is a preeminent Health IT strategist and an established subject matter expert in value-based care payment models. As the founder and CEO of the “HIT Like a Girl” podcast, she amplifies diverse voices, fostering innovation and connection within the healthcare industry. Her groundbreaking “RoadtoHLTH” journey further underscores her commitment to enhancing healthcare interoperability. With an unwavering passion for merging health, technology, and meaningful dialogue, Joy’s insights inspire both industry veterans and newcomers alike. Her visionary leadership and in-depth knowledge position her at the forefront of healthcare’s rapidly evolving landscape.


Health and Tech Professionals Gather Once Again at the 2023 HIT Conference

Our annual Health Information Technology Conference (HIT) will return to Salt Lake on Wednesday, October 18 at the Conference Center at Gail Miller Campus, SLCC. This year, we’ll look towards the “future of healthcare interoperability” with speakers, leaders and professionals from across the healthcare and technology continuum. While we will also celebrate the fact that 2023 marks our 30th year as an innovative organization, we will keep our focus on what’s coming up in the world of healthcare and technology. Some of our most exciting topics include:

  • Artificial Intelligence in healthcare
  • Billing for today and beyond
  • Cybersecurity
  • Digital transformation in healthcare
  • Documentation burden
  • HL7 and FHIR
  • Health equity
  • Health Data Utilities (HDUs)
  • Medicare updates
  • Mental health and burn out
  • Population Health
Dr. Angela Dunn

Dr. Angela Dunn, Executive Director of the Salt Lake County Health Department, will deliver our welcome keynote address in the morning.

Joy Rios

Joy Rios, founder and host of the HIT Like a Girl podcast, will present the afternoon keynote address.

We look forward to seeing you on October 18th!


How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 4 of 4)

Doctor at laptop

4 Questions to Ask

Question 4: How Does Your EDI Partner Reduce the Burden of Claims Submission for Providers?

Plan members want access to a range of high- quality providers. Without a robust provider network, health plans are challenged to grow membership and differentiate themselves from competitors.

The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) 2022 Index reported that providers spend ten minutes submitting a single electronic claim on average. For paper, it’s 22 minutes. A large part of this is repetitive data entry. These time blocks add up to significant resource drains in a typical day. Alleviating stressors will reduce payer-provider friction and promote cooperation in your common goal to improve health outcomes for members.

With the right EDI partner, you can streamline operations, reduce administrative burden, and improve your organization’s bottom line. Embracing new technologies and cooperative partnerships can help you gain a competitive advantage and, ultimately, provide better care to members.

Our fourth and final question leads you to ask yourself: “Is my EDI partner providing holistic support to my partner’s and my own organization’s operations?”

White paper

Ready to jump to all four questions? Want to see how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

How Does Your EDI Partner Reduce the Burden of Claims Submission for Providers?

Plan members want access to a range of high- quality providers. Without a robust provider network, health plans are challenged to grow membership and differentiate themselves from competitors.

The healthcare industry is becoming more consumer-driven and labor shortages continue to mount. Health plans need to be mindful of provider relationships and the administrative burdens your claims processing may be placing on them.

The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) 2022 Index reported that providers spend ten minutes submitting a single electronic claim on average. For paper, it’s 22 minutes. A large part of this is repetitive data entry. These time blocks add up to significant resource drains in a typical day. Alleviating stressors will reduce payer-provider friction and promote cooperation in your common goal to improve health outcomes for members.

Your healthcare EDI partner should help you to help providers with an affordable billing tool. Our solution, MYUHIN, reduces repetitive data-entry, and solidifies coding and submissions data to satisfy your processing requirements. Providers can use MYUHIN to submit claims, check patient eligibility, and search, view, and download payment information from any computer, any where.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.


How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 3 of 4)

4 Questions to Ask

Question 3: Are Providers Frequently Contacting You With Questions About Their Claims?

Health plans constantly seek to optimize their high-performing provider networks which provide value to members and patients. To grow these important networks, payers should nurture their provider relationships through personal attention and cutting edge technology.

This is particularly important at a time of mounting staffing shortages and rhetoric of economic downturns. Additionally, medical claim volume increased by 28% in 2022 as vaccines became available, medical offices reopened and pandemic regulations softened. When you add this up, the need for administrative simplification becomes more obvious for health plans and providers.

Tracking down claims, managing denials and submitting myriad claims can burden staff, compound labor costs and decrease profitability. When your provider network is stressed then your ability to grow as a carrier is impacted. Your EDI partner should automate workflows and manage your trading partner network so your support staff can focus on more strategic priorities, rather than answering phone calls and emails all day long.

Our third question addresses this concern as you ask yourself, “how does my EDI partner stack up?”

White paper

Ready to jump to all four questions? Want to see how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

Are Providers Frequently Contacting You With Questions About Their Claims?

When resources are tied up managing claim inquiries, you’re likely underperforming your peers and weakening your organization.

An inability to provide visibility to track and troubleshoot claims in a timely fashion can create financial implications. The increased demand on staff can decrease productivity, which could further delay payments and lead to staff burnout and turnover. Payers must respond to providers within a regulated timeframe, and providers rely on prompt payment for cashflows and their own business growth. Further dissatisfaction amongst providers and members can upend the collaborative nature of interoperability and could drive providers and members away to different plans.

The volume of inquiries to track down claims can burden staff and compound labor costs through the need to hire additional people. The situation can foster negativity between providers and operators, reducing satisfaction for both groups. Your EDI partner should work with you to increase your ability to automate claims processing. Part of this is facilitating a simple, electronic process for providers to submit their transactions and understand the status along the way.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.


How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 2 of 4)

4 Questions to Ask

Question 2: Can your Clearinghouse validate claims? Can you customize validation to your needs?

Claim validation should be par for the course. Still, many clearinghouses cannot properly validate claims. Much less, health plans are left unable to customize settings that allow for certain transactions while rejecting others. This leads to decreased adoption of auto-adjudication and on-going manual intervention that increases costs and decreases productivity.

SNIP Validation is a common solution for EDI data validation and compliance. There are seven (7) SNIP types and each health plan can tailor type settings to their needs. The right EDI partner works with their health plans to ensure the types are appropriately calibrated and implemented.

This leads to the second question to ask when wondering, “how does my EDI partner stack up?”

White paper

Ready to jump to all four questions? Want to see how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

Can your Clearinghouse validate claims? Can you customize validation to your needs?

Ensuring claims are HIPAA compliant and in a valid EDI format before they enter your system is key to streamlining the claims process.

Effective validation reduces administrative workload, mitigates risk of non-compliance, and helps avoid wasted time and provider appeals. SNIP Validation is an important step for pre-adjudication, scalability and profitable growth. Every plan operates at a different level of preparedness. One health plan may be working toward full automation, while another might seek to relieve staff burden to focus on other initiatives. Depending on your systems and goals, an EDI partner can support and modify the validation set-up to support your strategic needs.

SNIP Types

  1. EDI Standard Integrity Testing: Validates the basic syntactical integrity of the EDI submission.
  2. HIPAA Implementation Guide Requirement Testing: Involves testing for HIPAA implementation guide-specific syntax requirements.
  3. HIPAA Balance Testing: Involves ensuring that amounts reported in different places add up correctly.
  4. HIPAA Inter-Segment Situation Testing: Testing of specific intersegment situations described in the HIPAA implementation guides.
  5. HIPAA External Code Set Testing: Testing for valid implementation guide-specific code set values, as well as other code sets adopted as HIPAA standards.
  6. Product Type/Type of Service Testing: Ensures that the segments (records) of data that differ based on certain healthcare services are properly created and processed into claims data formats.
  7. Trading Partner-Specific Testing: The Implementation Guides contain some HIPAA requirements that are specific to Medicare, Medicaid, and Indian Health.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.


How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 1 of 4)

4 Questions to Ask

Question 1: Why are you with your current EDI vendor?

Health plans are often led to believe that healthcare electronic data interchange (EDI) vendors and Clearinghouses are utilities. Just a means to an end. It’s true that utilities – such as water – and EDI vendors both follow regulated protocols and move standardized, secure things.

When you turn on the faucet in your kitchen or bathroom, you expect clean, clear water delivered immediately and at your desired temperature. Often it works perfectly. However, you don’t typically choose where the water comes from or the company who provides water to you. You don’t adjust your settings at an infrastructure level and underlying delivery issues may be well beyond your control.

As a health plan, you can select your EDI vendor, enhance your provider network, adjust settings at an infrastructure level, and get ahead of underlying issues. Beneath the surface, health plans can work with expert EDI partners (not just vendors) to navigate turbulent waters together and deliver seemingly fluid experience and impactful outcomes. This process is understandably daunting despite the increased adoption of automated processes.

For this reason, health plans should ask four key questions to understand the value that their EDI vendor is bringing to the table. Our next four blog posts will cover these four simple, yet critical questions for health plans:

  1. With many options out there, why are you with your current EDI vendor? Are they just a vendor in your tech stack or do they serve you as a partner should?
  2. Can your Clearinghouse validate claims? Can you customize validation to your needs?
  3. Is your provider network frequently contacting you with questions? How does this impact your staff, strategy and budget?
  4. How does your EDI partner alleviate the burden of claims submission and simplify your administrative workflow?
White paper

Ready to read all four questions now? Want to know how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

Why Are You With Your Current EDI Vendor or Clearinghouse?

Our first post is introspective. We’ll look at the reasons you may be with your current Clearinghouse or EDI vendor, and how they should serve you to meet the strategic objectives of your department and company as a whole. Keep reading about the way it’s always been, and the futurist approach that health plans should take with a key strategic EDI partner.

The Way Clearinghouses Have Worked

Healthcare EDI networks have been built on vendor relationships that can be daunting and confusing, despite best intentions and the increased adoption of automated processes. Vendors offer “sticky” solutions that can entangle health plans with complicated agreements, abrasive onboarding processes, and technology that may not provide meaningful value.

Today, the essence of a partnership can get lost in the complications of healthcare EDI management. We can shift this paradigm by remembering we’re all in this together – from payers to trading partners, and providers to patients.

So, What Keeps You With Your Current Clearinghouse?

Does your partner simplify administrative burden? Do you have visibility into transactions? Do you receive timely, expert guidance on future X12 standards and HIPAA compliant transactions? An EDI partner should be focused on your holistic operations, and not merely transactions (though they should do those well, too). Perhaps it’s time to rethink the status quo.

If your EDI vendor is not serving you as a partner, you may want to consider what this relationship is costing you.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.


Provider Credentialing and Provider Enrollment: What’s the Difference and Why Does it Matter?

Patient at doctor's office reception desk with nurse

Provider enrollment is crucial for health plans to ensure that members have access to a full range of services. Credentialing verifies a clinician’s training and licensing. Enrollment establishes the technical connection between the provider and the plan. The processes can be complex and time-consuming, but partnering with dedicated enrollment experts – like UHIN – can help streamline the onboarding experience and accelerate success in a highly competitive marketplace.

Why Enrollment Matters

Health plans are constantly looking for better ways to serve the insured, from developing innovative wellness benefits to making it easier to access high-quality, affordable care in the community.

Provider network development is a huge component of this quest for continuous improvement.  Contracting with the right mix of providers – and enough of them – ensures that members can get a full range of services within an acceptable time frame.

Building this ecosystem isn’t always easy, especially when it comes to the nuts and bolts of bringing clinicians on board. Provider credentialing and provider enrollment are equally critical, yet they can often cause confusion and problems on both sides of the plan-provider relationship. 

In fact, providers not being registered/credentialed with a payer is the #1 reason for denials. The #2 reason for denials: the provider did not complete the payer-required process for enrollment.

Both steps – credentialing and enrollment – are crucial. However, even the fundamental differences between the two activities aren’t always clear, especially because they bump up against each other during onboarding. It’s important to understand what’s involved in each process, how they work, and why finding the right partner matters so much to health plans as they grow and mature.

What is Provider Credentialing?

Provider credentialing is the act of verifying that a clinician has the correct training and licensing to practice in their area of expertise. It’s similar to an extensive background check. The process starts after a provider submits a request to work with a practice, health system, or health plan. Collecting this extensive dataset can take up to three months or longer. 

While UHIN does not currently support the credentialing process, certain industry applications are in place, including the CAQH credentialing application. Until the credentialing process is complete, a provider cannot finish the rest of the enrollment process with a health plan. This is especially important for 98 percent of providers in the US who participate in Medicare and Medicare Advantage. In addition, nearly every health plan, including Medicare, requires EDI enrollment in order to start getting reimbursed for services.

What is Provider Enrollment?

Once a provider is officially welcomed into the network, the majority of health plans will require them to complete Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) enrollment, which is the technical connection between the provider and the plan. EDI enrollment allows providers to submit electronic claims to the plan and receive remittance for their services.

Electronic claims submission is nearly universal in the medical industry, according to the latest CAQH index report. In 2022, 97 percent of claims submissions transactions occurred electronically, giving both providers and health plans a strong motivation to ensure they are appropriately connected.

Unfortunately, neither the administrative nor the EDI enrollment processes are standardized across different health plans. This forces providers to juggle many different requirements and documentation requests for each individual payer. The complexity of managing requests from a slew of disparate plans and providers can lead to mistakes and omissions that extend the timeline. 

Even more information may be required during EDI enrollment than credentialing. This can take an additional four to six weeks (or longer) on top of the credentialing timeframe. This is especially true if extensive contract negotiations are necessary or IT challenges get in the way.

In addition, smaller provider groups often do not have enough people-power to devote exclusively to enrollment, making it even more difficult for plans and providers to work together effectively.   

UHIN’s Enrollment Team provides detailed next steps for enrollment based on each specific payer and transaction type for each case. Additionally, we provide defined next steps to move forward with enrollment, based on the payer requirements. UHIN can be reached at enrollment@uhin.org and we will be happy to provide enrollment direction, advice and helpful support through the EDI enrollment process.

How Can Health Plans Streamline Enrollment Processes?

Just like many other areas of the healthcare ecosystem, provider EDI enrollment can significantly benefit from digitization and strong partnerships with expert teams. The widespread lack of standardized processes means plans and providers have to consider each request as a one-off, which can take a great deal of time and effort to parse through without some help.

Charting a Course for Success

When working with providers, health plans should offer clear and detailed instructions on the information needed and the deadlines for delivering it.

Plans should assess their needs by charting out their existing enrollment workflow and identifying any bottlenecks that lead to lag time. Often, these pain points are related to delays in collecting information from providers and internal delays in processing paperwork once received. The result of these delays are wild swings in average completion time for provider onboarding, which creates unpredictability on both sides of the relationship. 

Finding the Right Support

On the internal front, plans should seek out enrollment partners that can field provider requests on behalf of the payer, taking the task off the shoulders of health plan staff. It should take a specialist enrollment team less than one business day to process a request once all of the information is received. There may be additional waiting time depending on the unique payer requirements.

Health plans and providers should make sure they are working with a dedicated enrollment team that can take deep dives into problem-solving when unique technical or administrative challenges arise, such as a technology enhancement that can lead to the need for a process rewrite.

An experienced partner, such as UHIN, offers an expert enrollment team to help navigate the complicated enrollment process. Although we do not currently provide credentialing support, we have a proven history in expediting and accurately guiding providers through the enrollment process. Our enrollment team is based in the US and delivers in-depth knowledge and support to make the enrollment process as frictionless as possible. We can handle any questions you may have in this complicated and critical process.

Partnering with the Right EDI Enrollment Experts

Enrollment involves complex activities with many moving pieces. Getting them right is vital for the success of health plans and provider groups. By understanding the nuances of the process, plans and providers can start to tackle the pinch points that make network development so challenging. Plans that enlist the help of dedicated partners to take on key tasks, such as enrollment, have a better chance of creating a smoother onboarding experience and accelerating their success in a highly competitive marketplace.

UHIN’s enrollment team offers years of experience helping providers through the enrollment process. We provide direct support and in-depth knowledge to expedite the enrollment process and get providers over the finish line no matter how complex or unique the process may be.

Are you a current provider with a UHIN account and interested in learning more about enrollment? Contact enrollment@uhin.org or customer service at 877-693-3071.

If you’re new to UHIN, click below and tell us how we can help streamline EDI enrollment onboarding and relieve burdens for your health plan!


Prior Authorization Legislation and the X12 Winter Meeting

Image via X12

As an attendee of the X12 Winter Meeting this January, I noticed a difference compared to previous conferences. This year the primary focus was legislation, reviving past and pending transactions and standards legislation, and creating new legislative initiatives. There was discussion around the 5010 Standard currently in place that was mandated 13 years ago. That Standard is 20 years old now and is required only for a limited number of transactions.

UHIN Comments and the Path Forward

UHIN has spent a lot of time developing comments and reviewing the different options for moving forward with the currently pending version of the proposed rule for pre-auth for the 6020 Standard. That rule is officially known as “Administrative Simplification: Adoption of Standards for Health Care Attachments Transactions and Electronic Signatures, and Modification to Referral Certification and Authorization Transaction Standard.”

X12, WEDI, and Cooperative Exchange have each proposed solutions to help move this forward. What has been clear from all the industry groups is without a mandate, standards are further delayed, and if history repeats itself, the current proposed change will likely be out of date before it can be mandated.

How Payers Could Get Ahead of the Curve

Understandably, there’s hesitation to adopt a rule that’s not yet mandated. The current discussion would mandate the 6020 standard that is currently part of the proposed rule. However, payers may want to consider whether beginning implementation anyway could be the right course for them. There are advantages to doing so, including allowing operations to track closer to what we believe are best practices for your business. A methodology pivot may be necessary after the final rule is in place, but you’d be ahead of the curve.

In its fact sheet on the rule, CMS cites research by CAQH, which finds healthcare industry savings of $828 million per year could be achieved from the adoption of automated electronic processing of claims, including prior-auth and attachments. Of course, an industry-wide standard is a key pillar in supporting automation.

Clarification on Paper Claims

The federal government appears to be using prior-auth as a carrot to encourage providers to cut the fax and snail mail cords. CMS has published a helpful fact sheet on the rule. In the FAQs, it explains that providers who submit paper requests for pre-auth to payers are not subject to this HIPAA rule but, “The provider would be a covered entity if their paper claims were submitted to a health care clearinghouse or a billing service, and, on behalf of the provider, that health care clearinghouse or the billing service transformed them into standard electronic transactions and transmitted them to a health plan.”

The comment period for the currently pending attachments and prior-auth rule for the 6020 standard will close on March 21, 2023.

Working Toward a Universal Language

The best standards are those that scale. We think the currently proposed rule is an important step toward a universal language for interchange, and we look forward to moving 278s in a standard fashion in the future.

UHIN has been implementing standards since 1999, starting with the first national standard 4010, and continues to be the leader in Utah in setting standards.  We work with both health plans and providers to better understand pending legislation and standards.

If you’re interested in the output of our committee, which sets standards for all of Utah, click here to view our library on the UHIN Knowledge Center. You can reference a variety of information, including payer responsibilities associated with the current standards.

By Boyd Kreeck, Senior Technical Business Analyst, UHIN