How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 4 of 4)

Doctor at laptop

4 Questions to Ask

Question 4: How Does Your EDI Partner Reduce the Burden of Claims Submission for Providers?

Plan members want access to a range of high- quality providers. Without a robust provider network, health plans are challenged to grow membership and differentiate themselves from competitors.

The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) 2022 Index reported that providers spend ten minutes submitting a single electronic claim on average. For paper, it’s 22 minutes. A large part of this is repetitive data entry. These time blocks add up to significant resource drains in a typical day. Alleviating stressors will reduce payer-provider friction and promote cooperation in your common goal to improve health outcomes for members.

With the right EDI partner, you can streamline operations, reduce administrative burden, and improve your organization’s bottom line. Embracing new technologies and cooperative partnerships can help you gain a competitive advantage and, ultimately, provide better care to members.

Our fourth and final question leads you to ask yourself: “Is my EDI partner providing holistic support to my partner’s and my own organization’s operations?”

White paper

Ready to jump to all four questions? Want to see how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

How Does Your EDI Partner Reduce the Burden of Claims Submission for Providers?

Plan members want access to a range of high- quality providers. Without a robust provider network, health plans are challenged to grow membership and differentiate themselves from competitors.

The healthcare industry is becoming more consumer-driven and labor shortages continue to mount. Health plans need to be mindful of provider relationships and the administrative burdens your claims processing may be placing on them.

The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) 2022 Index reported that providers spend ten minutes submitting a single electronic claim on average. For paper, it’s 22 minutes. A large part of this is repetitive data entry. These time blocks add up to significant resource drains in a typical day. Alleviating stressors will reduce payer-provider friction and promote cooperation in your common goal to improve health outcomes for members.

Your healthcare EDI partner should help you to help providers with an affordable billing tool. Our solution, MYUHIN, reduces repetitive data-entry, and solidifies coding and submissions data to satisfy your processing requirements. Providers can use MYUHIN to submit claims, check patient eligibility, and search, view, and download payment information from any computer, any where.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.


How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 3 of 4)

4 Questions to Ask

Question 3: Are Providers Frequently Contacting You With Questions About Their Claims?

Health plans constantly seek to optimize their high-performing provider networks which provide value to members and patients. To grow these important networks, payers should nurture their provider relationships through personal attention and cutting edge technology.

This is particularly important at a time of mounting staffing shortages and rhetoric of economic downturns. Additionally, medical claim volume increased by 28% in 2022 as vaccines became available, medical offices reopened and pandemic regulations softened. When you add this up, the need for administrative simplification becomes more obvious for health plans and providers.

Tracking down claims, managing denials and submitting myriad claims can burden staff, compound labor costs and decrease profitability. When your provider network is stressed then your ability to grow as a carrier is impacted. Your EDI partner should automate workflows and manage your trading partner network so your support staff can focus on more strategic priorities, rather than answering phone calls and emails all day long.

Our third question addresses this concern as you ask yourself, “how does my EDI partner stack up?”

White paper

Ready to jump to all four questions? Want to see how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

Are Providers Frequently Contacting You With Questions About Their Claims?

When resources are tied up managing claim inquiries, you’re likely underperforming your peers and weakening your organization.

An inability to provide visibility to track and troubleshoot claims in a timely fashion can create financial implications. The increased demand on staff can decrease productivity, which could further delay payments and lead to staff burnout and turnover. Payers must respond to providers within a regulated timeframe, and providers rely on prompt payment for cashflows and their own business growth. Further dissatisfaction amongst providers and members can upend the collaborative nature of interoperability and could drive providers and members away to different plans.

The volume of inquiries to track down claims can burden staff and compound labor costs through the need to hire additional people. The situation can foster negativity between providers and operators, reducing satisfaction for both groups. Your EDI partner should work with you to increase your ability to automate claims processing. Part of this is facilitating a simple, electronic process for providers to submit their transactions and understand the status along the way.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.


How Does Your EDI Partner Stack Up? (Part 2 of 4)

4 Questions to Ask

Question 2: Can your Clearinghouse validate claims? Can you customize validation to your needs?

Claim validation should be par for the course. Still, many clearinghouses cannot properly validate claims. Much less, health plans are left unable to customize settings that allow for certain transactions while rejecting others. This leads to decreased adoption of auto-adjudication and on-going manual intervention that increases costs and decreases productivity.

SNIP Validation is a common solution for EDI data validation and compliance. There are seven (7) SNIP types and each health plan can tailor type settings to their needs. The right EDI partner works with their health plans to ensure the types are appropriately calibrated and implemented.

This leads to the second question to ask when wondering, “how does my EDI partner stack up?”

White paper

Ready to jump to all four questions? Want to see how your EDI partner stacks up? Download our white paper here.

Can your Clearinghouse validate claims? Can you customize validation to your needs?

Ensuring claims are HIPAA compliant and in a valid EDI format before they enter your system is key to streamlining the claims process.

Effective validation reduces administrative workload, mitigates risk of non-compliance, and helps avoid wasted time and provider appeals. SNIP Validation is an important step for pre-adjudication, scalability and profitable growth. Every plan operates at a different level of preparedness. One health plan may be working toward full automation, while another might seek to relieve staff burden to focus on other initiatives. Depending on your systems and goals, an EDI partner can support and modify the validation set-up to support your strategic needs.

SNIP Types

  1. EDI Standard Integrity Testing: Validates the basic syntactical integrity of the EDI submission.
  2. HIPAA Implementation Guide Requirement Testing: Involves testing for HIPAA implementation guide-specific syntax requirements.
  3. HIPAA Balance Testing: Involves ensuring that amounts reported in different places add up correctly.
  4. HIPAA Inter-Segment Situation Testing: Testing of specific intersegment situations described in the HIPAA implementation guides.
  5. HIPAA External Code Set Testing: Testing for valid implementation guide-specific code set values, as well as other code sets adopted as HIPAA standards.
  6. Product Type/Type of Service Testing: Ensures that the segments (records) of data that differ based on certain healthcare services are properly created and processed into claims data formats.
  7. Trading Partner-Specific Testing: The Implementation Guides contain some HIPAA requirements that are specific to Medicare, Medicaid, and Indian Health.

UHIN is a national EDI network built in 1993 by health plans. We partner with payers and providers across the US. Our approach to EDI and customer service is different. If you’re interest in learning more, please contact us today.